Business Process Mapping is one of the most effective ways of achieving your key business objectives. However, it's not always so easy to identify what objectives lean process mapping can actually help with.
In 2012 James Rowell, lecturer in Operations and Supply Chain Management at the University of Buckingham, attended a Triaster Customer Experience Event. He was struck by the fact that all of the organisations presenting had made the decision to map their processes for very different business reasons.
This led James to undertake a research project for which he interviewed a number of Triaster customers to explore the projects that they were managing.
The results elucidate the business objectives, implementation and the benefits achieved by the respondent companies. The companies interviewed ranged from agriculture, banking, construction, engineering, local authorities, logistics, and software development.
We are grateful to James for sharing these results with us. An extract of his findings is below.
Companies have implemented Process Mapping Software for a whole plethora of reasons, both relating to internal and external benefits. If you are interested in learning how business process mapping can save time and drive down costs in your organisation, feel free to read the Triaster Process Mapping White Paper by clicking below:
As with all objectives there is often an overlap, for example, improving internal activities develops better service for customers. The following section lists those identified by the participating companies.
The breadth of objectives for business process management set out in their various presentations was extremely divergent. Thus an interesting phenomenon came to light, which, from a business research perspective appeared to be very interesting.
Companies have applied their PMS in a range of process improvement contexts to achieve their own particular operating objectives. These include:
An interesting point was the contrast between those companies who focussed on external activities and those where internal management of the organisation was considered important. Some reasons given relied upon which part of the organisation had generated the introduction of PMS.
In other instances the geographic spread and a 24-hour work pattern was a predominant driver. One organisation used PMS to ensure consistency of service delivery in a sector where staff turnover was a prevailing management issue - hence it was a key part of the infrastructure for training and staff development.
To read the full report, please click here:
The Top 10 Benefits of Process Mapping
5 Process Mapping Tips: Getting People On Board, Not Making them Bored
Process Mapping How To: A Practical Solution to Stop You Getting Lost